On “Critical Approaches to Black Media Culture” Conference.

Reflections on my time in New Orleans, French Quarter. February 2024.


For the past year or so I’ve been participating in the Archiving The Black Web (AtBW) project. The growth of social media presents a unique opportunity to archivists and memory workers interested in documenting the contemporary black experience. As part of this mission, I conducted semi-structured interviews with 15 members of the Black Queer Twitter community to document self presentation and community building efforts online. The other scholars of the AtBW and I submitted our independent projects as part of a panel to the “Critical Approaches to Black Media Culture” conference hosted by Tulane University. Due to the phenomenal efforts of Meredith Clark and the AtBW team, we were accepted to present and discuss our work in NEW ORLEANS.

I was so excited because: 1) this was a chance to explore a different communities/venues than your typical HCI/CSCW conference that centered black culture and media; 2) I had always wanted to visit New Orleans!

Quickly: New Orleans was a BLAST!!

A couple months in Ithaca had me ready for Mardi Gras and neighborhood block parties, lots of street photography, delicious food, cutting UP!! with funny and warm southern black people, learning more about voodoo/hoodoo religion and local legends like Marie Leveau, and so much more!I was living my best life liiiiike:

I listened to an older local gentleman talk about his lost lady love and how he preserved a space in a mausoleum for them to lie together for eternity once he died. I listened to and comforted a crying a lady sob bitterly over broken social ties and being abandoned on Mardi Gras. I witnessed so much humanity in so little time.

The people really made New Orleans a magical experience.

(picture depicts blackened redfish): and the FOOD, chile, let me not forget the food. I never knew fish could do what it did. Magical.

The people that I met at the conference and shared my work with really made for a powerful experience.

Coming into this experience, working on my project came with a lot of growing pains and I grew hyper aware of how othered my research project felt in predominantly white institutions where certain experiences are simply not centered.

So I was so nervous! Nervous about doing justice to my participants and the data they’ve entrusted me with. Nervous about public speaking. Nervous I wouldn’t finish my presentation notes 20 minutes before my talk.

But presenting at the “Critical Approaches to Black Media Culture conference” was different from my other conference experiences for very important reasons.

I remember standing outside of my presentation room urging myself to enter and I met the kindest black lady who gave me a pep talk and reminded me that this conference was here for people like me and that they were here cheering me on.

Grounded by her words I entered the room and marched to the front to set up my presentation. This same lady later decided to join and listened to my panel talk. That was way more than what I could have expected, it was so kind of her!

The 3rd presenter was not able to attend so it was me and Sinnamon Love on a panel on Black Interiority.

It was wonderful.

Here, amongst other black scholars, Science and research felt truly joyous and fruitful. People laughed at my jokes. People engaged with it critically but also joyfully. They could see the humor in the data and results due to that shared cultural humor and experiences. I found the session so helpful because there was no longer this wall between me and my audience. People had deeper questions about my research.

One of my favorite talks: “Digital SPILL: Black Data and Meaning Making in New Social Media”

I’ve workshopped the early stages paper at Cornell but I could tell that’s not where the work belonged. Where people could engage with it critically but also joyfully. Who could see the humor in the data and results due to that shared cultural humor and experiences. Here, I felt lighter and I realized how long I’ve carried the burden of proof. What I mean by that is – Even though persuasion is part of the game of science, It was super nice to feel that I didn’t have to do an extra layer of translational work because the research was on black people and culture. Here, I was encouraged to be more bold and more authentic in my future work. Here, black people were centered as knowledge producers. Here, I felt like my work belonged and that it had found a home.

I haven’t recovered from the fact we listened to “Changes” by Tupac Shakur as part of critical research 🖤 Home is where the music is ~

I left New Orleans with my belly full of beignet and my heart full of love and pride for the work I do.

Being here also made me confront and challenge my own bias for what is considered knowledge, who creates knowledge, and who legitimizes knowledge.

After I returned to Ithaca I got back to work figuring out my next steps

I later spoke to a colleague at CAT Lab about next steps for the paper. The conversation kinda went like this:

Me: “NOLA was great! … time to send the paper to a conference.”

Her: “Didn’t you just present it at one?”

Me: “I mean like HCI or CSCW or AOIR”

Her: “But you already done the things . You would have the same experiences at those conferences”

At that moment, I was confused. I then realized what I was subconsciously angling at – legitimacy. My work could only be legitimate if it entered the annals of well recognized and historic conferences like CHI and CSCW. Spaces that held a lot of power. Because surely, a conference that was for black people, centered black people, could not be legitimate in the same way even though the methods and rigor was all the same, no?

Upon reflection, I realized that being in this space brought to light my own internalized anti-blackness within academic spaces that managed to remain hidden from even myself. I had thought that this was a part of myself that I had long since interrogated and proven wrong.

It makes sense why it had for so long. I had only pivoted into more critical work last year. I had gone from a pure focus on HCI/UX to more critical work, i.e I had to deal with real people, real populations, real differences when it came to my work. Research and data became messier in a way that they were not for me before.

I’m still grappling with the increasing ‘realness’ of my work as I navigate power hierarchies in these institutions of knowledge. I’m learning everyday and more than anything I’m thankful for the communities and support I find along the way way as I learn more about myself and the world around me.

I decided that I wouldn’t submit to another conference because my colleague, as she often has the tendency to be, is right. I considered what was best not just for me (or rather my ego) but what was best for the work itself. It had found its home in New Orleans.

Geeked,

J


We really got to find the places that accept us and our work so I’m also gonna be noting of Qualitative Friendly conferences as I come upon them.

https://icqi.org/home/submission/

Meeting CASBS fellows

A quick picture outside of the CASBS complex. Reunited and it feels so gooooood!

After I finished CRA-WP for the women’s event in San Francisco, I boarded the train for an hour-long ride to Palo Alto. I was to spend the day at CASBS to have my advisor meeting and to learn more about CASBS and the kind of work they do there.


What is CASBS?

Situated on bucolic hills overlooking Stanford University, CASBS, or the Center for Advanced Study in the Social Behavioral Sciences, has hosted scientists and scholars engaged in pioneering research for decades. Here participants are given the space to think about critical issues of our time and to form strategies for evidence-based policy and solutions. Essentially, CASBS is an incubator for leading human-centered knowledge to design a better future for society.

It’s super cool that my advisor was selected as a fellow!

2022 – 2023 Fellows

We visited the CASBS library – a collection that represents works donated or reported to CASBS by individual fellows or their publishers. Maybe my advisor’s work is going to find a home here too! As I looked around, I picked up some of the books that caught my eye:


Who were some of the spectacular people I got to meet?

Maisha Winn– Education | UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS

Angela Aristidou – Management | UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON

Nitsan Chorev – Sociology | BROWN UNIVERSITY

Anne L. Washington, PhD |  Public Interest Technologist  | NYU Steinhardt School

  • Anne was not a CASBS fellow at the time that I visited but she was at CASBS for a week or so to do some work and she kicks-ASS!

It was an amazing opportunity to meet each of them. I joined their lunch and listened to them speak to each other and woah – it’s very much a different language and they speak it with such dexterity. I watched them succinctly package and deliver knowledge to each other in a way that supports their work and creates intellectual bonds that will follow them beyond their time at CASBS. It astounds me that they are able to retain so much information – they are walking libraries! This work is very much a big part of demonstrating one’s value and expertise in academia and I aspire to improve my own professional communication practice in the coming year.

Not only were they aspirational, but they were also incredibly gracious to me: I introduced myself and talked about my current research projects. I appreciated that they made me talk about my work and gave me this chance to practice presenting my work. They were enthusiastic about supporting my interests and providing feedback on how I could go about thinking about my work.


I note this to remind myself (and to remind anyone who might be reading this that might need it) that improvement is incremental and it comes from these small moments. I have a tendency to wonder “Why am I not there yet? Why does my mind not yet work like that?” but writing this post and reflecting here helps me see that I am doing the work here and now but not only that, there are plenty of people who I’m meeting that have become part of my training in big and small ways. The ability to reaffirm yourself during the Ph.D. journey is critical to keep going at it, so find methods for you that work.

What that also looks like for me is finding ways to improve upon what I think needs work, so I signed up for my local Toastmasters and my advisor sent me The Shy Guide to Speaking Up: Grad Seminar Edition.

This was a great trip and thank you to my advisor and his assistant for their phenomenal organizational skills in making this trip possible 🙂

Cornell University Library’s 2023 Graduate Immersion Program for doctoral students in the humanities and social sciences.

Winter 2023 Cohort

The four-day program took place January 12-13 and through January 17-18, 2023. 

Attendance for all sessions is mandatory. Programming is scheduled for 9:15 AM – ~5:00 PM (lunch will be provided), in Olin and Uris libraries.

here is the library guide associated with the program and from which I draw the content of this page: http://guides.library.cornell.edu/olingrad.

Librarians Rock.

That’s my main takeaway from participating in the immersion program. I was able to meet librarians who were incredible researchers and investigators themselves. They helped me learn important resources that would make me a more efficient researcher during the course of my Ph.D. program.

Below I will review just a few of the topics that we went over. This is not an exhaustive list of what was offered nor of their content, but rather these were the topics I found most useful for me at that time.

I will list the learning outcomes for each topic and some notes.

As an Info Sci student, why did I find myself here? well, there were a lot of research skills I, for one reason or another, did not learn and so I’m finding ways to make sure I fill the gaps in my knowledge that I need to make my time smoother as I move through a PhD. I also find that my research is becoming more nuanced and as a result – I need to do more reading than what I’ve done prior to inform my emerging research topics. Thus, I found myself back in the library.

me anytime I don’t know what I’m doing.

This program was also a great way to learn a little more about other disciplines outside of InfoSci. I met some really cool folks and the program gives you time to talk and get to know each other during the program. I met some cool people who do research on the Nigerian Biafran Civil War to others who do research in urban architecture. To be in spaces where I can be curious about many things and learn from others outside of my discipline, is what I love about liberal arts education.


1. Digital File Management: Foundations, Devin Sanera

Session Outcomes

    • A solid grasp of the key elements to take into account when managing digital files
    • Tips on utilities and strategies to make the plan easier and keep costs down
    • A sense of encouragement that such a plan is possible, practical, and personally beneficial
    • The understanding that the plan will require periodic evaluation and revision

Notes:

  • The Data Storage Finder is a self-service, interactive tool to select storage services based on features important to you. Choose just those you want to learn more about, or explore and compare them all, in one easy-to-use webpage

2. Digital Privacy, Reanna Esmail

Session Outcomes

  • Gain a better understanding of how privacy affects students as a researcher and 
  • Gain a better understanding of how to protect themselves online
  • Empower them to do a little every day to better protect themselves online

Notes:

“As a fellow librarian, I’m here to warn you: ICE is in your library stacks.” – Sarah Lamdan

FURTHER READING:

3. Managing Information with Zotero, Virginia Cole

Session Outcomes

  • Understand the functionality differences between Web Zotero and Zotero Desktop
  • Set up Zotero sync or implement alternatives
  • Use Zotero’s browser connectors to add books, articles, websites, and other materials and their associated PDFs to Zotero
  • Extract annotations from PDFs
  • Organize a Zotero library using tags, folders, and subfolders
  • Use Zotero’s word processor plugin to create citations and bibliographies

Notes:

  • ZoteroBib is a free service that helps you build a bibliography or make citations instantly from any computer or device, without creating an account or installing any software.
    • Zotero actually changed my life. One of the top products I have ever used, would 100 % recommend. I’m still learning new ways to use it and make it work for me.
  • This was probably the most helpful part of the tutorial for me, particularly for my projects involving digital archival research:
  • 4: Write a paper & make a quick bibliography
    • Make a standalone bibliography
      • 1. Highlight all items in a collection
        2. Right-click and choose “create bibliography”
        3. Choose a citation style, choose bibliography, and set to “copy to clipboard”
        4. Open Word, paste, correct citations if necessary
    • Write a paper using Zotero to insert citations and create a bibliography
      • 1. Insert citations in the citation style of your choice
        2. Check the citations for accuracy
        3. Correct mistakes in Zotero (not in the document
        4. Change the style
  • A lot of the data that I work with or use to inform my research are tweets. You can save images to zotero and look back at your screenshots:

  • 5: Blogs, Tweets, and sites from the Open Web.
    Add blog posts or pages from the open web (not from the library) using the snapshot feature
    1. Add a webpage/blog post with a snapshot
    2. Add a webpage/blog post without a snapshot

4. Managing Your Digital Presence, Iliana Burgos

Session Outcomes

  • Critically assess the strengths and weaknesses of academic platforms for networking and research-sharing
  • Identify platforms that work for your needs and interests

Notes:

  • This section encouraged me to take a look at various platforms that display me as a researcher like Academia.edu, etc. I decided to unsubscribe from some of those services because managing the sheer amount of platforms I had prior, would have been overwhelming otherwise. I think google scholar and LinkedIn and this website are enough for me.

5. Dissertations, Susette Newberry

Session Outcomes

  • Understand the benefits of using multiple sources, including ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, to explore previously published dissertations
  • Understand how the dissertation figures in the publishing cycle and consider options

Notes:


So take advantage of everything the Cornell University library has to offer.

The librarians offer such a wide range of expertise and are an incredible resource.

Ask the librarians questions.

Meet them. I met with a librarian via Zoom to help with one of my research projects.

They can help you perform systematic reviews of existing studies and answer new research questions.

The program was also surprisingly flexible. I had to take a break for a couple of hours to complete an interview with a company, so if something comes up like that ASK.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started